Click on the figure to enlarge it. |
In the SITC abstract (above) Craig et al. hypothesized production of a vaccine- like immune response using a small molecule drug was possible and required:
- An intralesional route of injection that generates rapid, durable tumor destruction via autolysis;
- Rapid clearance of drug from normal tissue; and
- Anti-tumor effects targeted only to tumor tissue.
"Treating cancer has historically relied on a trifecta of treatments—surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation—known colloquially as “slash, poison, and burn.” Vaccines have a potential advantage over these three options in that the body’s response is longer lasting (on a scale of years as opposed to weeks or months), which could possibly eradicate the micro-metastases that often linger after standard treatments end. Moreover, cancer vaccines have similar minor side effects to traditional vaccines: inflammation at the injection site and flu-like symptoms." Read more here.
"Cancer vaccines are designed to boost the body’s natural ability to protect itself, through the immune system, from dangers posed by damaged or abnormal cells such as cancer cells. The FDA has approved two types of vaccines to prevent cancer (Gardasil® and Cervarix®): vaccines against the hepatitis B virus, which can cause liver cancer, and vaccines against human papillomavirus types 16 and 18, which are responsible for about 70 percent of cervical cancer cases. The FDA has approved one cancer treatment vaccine for certain men with metastatic prostate cancer (Provenge®)." Read more here.
Click on the figure to enlarge it. |
No comments:
Post a Comment