Showing posts with label cancer immunity cycle. Show all posts
Showing posts with label cancer immunity cycle. Show all posts

May 12, 2016

Moffitt: IL RB in melanoma elicits tumor immunity via activation of DCs by the release of HMGB1

Updated below, again.

Article link: Intralesional rose bengal in melanoma elicits tumor immunity via activation of dendritic cells by the release of high mobility group box 1

H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute departments & facilities: Immunology, Flow Cytometry, Translational Science, Cutaneous Oncology, Pathology, and Cutaneous Data Management

Click to enlarge.
Takeaways:

These data/results:
  • "...support the role of IL [intralesional] RB to activate dendritic cells at the site of tumor necrosis for the induction of a systemic anti-tumor immune response,"
  • "...suggest that IL PV-10 can induce tumor-specific T cells with memory characteristics in M05 melanoma-bearing mice,"
  • "...show that CD8+ T cells are crucial for the tumor-specific immune response induced by IL injection of PV-10,"
  • "...support that IL injection of PV-10 can boost T cell infiltration in tumors,"
  • "...support a role for IL PV-10 to induce DCs [dendritic cells] to take up antigens at the tumor site, infiltrate into the DLN [draining lymph node], and become functionally mature,"
  • "...suggest that PV-10-treated tumors may release factors that activate DCs,"
  • "...suggest that PV-10 can kill tumor cells at a dose that is not toxic to non-tumor cells,"
  • "...support the role of IL PV-10 treatment to induce a systemic anti-tumor immune response in patients with metastatic melanoma," and
  • "...support the design of additional clinical studies to measure anti-tumor immune responses after IL injection of PV-10 in patients with melanoma."
The Cancer Immunity Cycle & PV-10
Click to enlarge.
ABSTRACT

Intralesional (IL) therapy is under investigation to treat dermal and subcutaneous metastatic cancer. Rose Bengal (RB) is a staining agent that was originally used by ophthalmologists and in liver function studies. IL injection of RB has been shown to induce regression of injected and uninjected tumors in murine models and clinical trials. In this study, we have shown a mechanism of tumor-specific immune response induced by IL RB. In melanoma-bearing mice, IL RB induced regression of injected tumor and inhibited the growth of bystander lesions mediated by CD8+ T cells. IL RB resulted in necrosis of tumor cells and the release of High Mobility Group Box 1 (HMGB1), with increased dendritic cell (DC) infiltration into draining lymph nodes and the activation of tumor-specific T cells. Treatment of DC with tumor supernatants increased the ability of DCs to stimulate T cell proliferation, and blockade of HMGB1 in the supernatants suppressed DC activity. Additionally, increased HMGB1 levels were measured in the sera of melanoma patients treated with IL RB. These results support the role of IL RB to activate dendritic cells at the site of tumor necrosis for the induction of a systemic anti-tumor immune response.

RESULTS, summary of article subtitles
  • IL PV-10 elicits a tumor-specific immune response
  • IL PV-10 leads to DC activation
  • PV-10 treatment increases DC activation via HMGB1
  • IL PV-10 leads to HMGB1 increase in the sera of melanoma patients
DISCUSSION

Melanoma incidence rates have increased rapidly in the United States over the past 30 years and is the fifth most common cancer in men and the seventh most common cancer in women [38]. IL therapy is a promising treatment modality for patients with dermal and/or subcutaneous metastatic melanoma. Importantly, it may induce not only local tumor regression but also a systemic anti-tumor immune response. In a recent clinical trial in metastatic melanoma patients, IL PV-10 led to a
50% objective response rate with mild to moderate side effects [17]. In treated patients, 8% had no evidence of disease after 52 weeks and 26% experienced complete regression in bystander lesions. However, the mechanism by which IL PV-10 leads to systemic anti-tumor immunity is unknown.

In this study, we showed that IL PV-10 led to the necrosis of melanoma cells and the release of HMGB1. These data are consistent with the observation that HMGB1 was passively released from photosensitized HeLa cells treated with a Rose Bengal analog [39]. Pretreatment with Rose Bengal acetate led to apoptosis and autophagy and the secretion of HSP70, HSP90 and HMGB1. In contrast, our results showed that PV-10 treatment induced necrosis in melanoma cells and the secretion of HMGB1, but not HSP70, while the amount of HSP90 was unchanged. This discrepancy may be explained by differences in response to RB and its acetate analog, dose of test article, differences in the cell lines used, or mechanisms of ablative and photodynamic therapies. Moreover, HMGB1 levels in the sera of patients were increased after IL PV-10. This is in line with another study that showed increased HMGB1 levels in the serum of cancer patients after chemoradiation; notably, HMGB1
levels were increased in patients with antigen-specific T cell responses and higher expression of HMGB1 in resected tumor samples was correlated with better survival [40].

Maturation of DCs is crucial for priming CD8+ T cells [41]. HMGB1 has been shown to be important for activation of myeloid and plasmacytoid DCs [25, 31, 42–46]. In our model, DC maturation with up-regulation of CD40, CD80 and CD86 was measured in tumor draining LN after IL PV-10. Furthermore, our study showed that HMGB1 in the supernatant of tumor cells treated with PV-10 was responsible for the up-regulation of CD40 expression on BM-derived DCs and for the increased ability of DC to stimulate T cell activation. It has been shown that short-term CD40 signaling augments DC migration to tumor-draining LNs and induced protective immunity. Moreover, HMGB1 has been shown to enhance DC responses to CCL9 and CXCL12 [47]. Interactions between HMGB1 and RAGE can induce the migration of s.c. injected DCs into DLNs [48]. In our study, IL PV-10
increased the number of DCs migrating from the tumor site into the draining LNs.

In this study, we have shown a mechanism of tumor-specific immune response induced by IL PV-10.
In melanoma-bearing mice, IL PV-10 induced necrosis of tumor cells leading to the release of HMGB1, which is crucial for DC activation. This resulted in DC maturation and infiltration into draining LNs for the activation of tumor-specific T cells. Additionally, increased HMGB1 levels measured in sera of patients treated with IL PV10 suggests that HMGB1 may be involved in eliciting a systemic immune response in patients. We have shown that circulating T cell populations and tumor-specific CD8+ T cells are increased in melanoma patients after IL PV-10 therapy. Together these results support the design of additional clinical studies to measure anti-tumor immune responses after IL injection of PV-10 in patients with melanoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS, Incl. Human subjects

Fifteen patients with dermal and/or subcutaneous metastatic melanoma were enrolled in a pilot study
(NCT01760499). Peripheral blood and serum were collected prior to biopsy, 7-14 days after IL PV-10 injection into a single melanoma tumor, and 21-28 days after IL PV-10 injection. PBMCs were isolated by Ficoll–Paque Plus (GE healthcare). Blood samples were sent for HLA typing to determinate HLA-matched tumor and HLA mismatched tumor for each patient. Serum was prepared by collecting the supernatant after incubation of blood at room temperature for 1 hour and centrifugation at 1,000 g. Two tumor lesions in each patient were sampled by biopsy pre-treatment; one of the two lesions was injected with IL PV-10 7 days after biopsy, then both residual sites were completely excised 7-14 days later. Biopsy specimens were fixed in formalin and embed in paraffin. The specimens were stained with hematoxylin and eosin stains for determination of pathologic complete response. Immunohistochemistry for melanin A (mel A) was performed. Flow cytometry was performed to detect CD3, CD4, CD8, and CD56 staining on PBMC.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Dr. Dmitry Gabrilovich for valuable comments during the preparation of this manuscript. This work was supported in part by the Flow Cytometry, Analytic Microscopy, and Tissue Core Facilities at the Moffitt Cancer Center, and in part by the Cancer Center Support Grant P30 CA076292 from the National Cancer Institute. This work was also supported by NCI-5K23CA178083-02 (AAS). PV-10 was provided by Provectus Biopharmaceuticals.

Updated (5/13/16): Provectus issued a press release and made an associated 8-K filing today related to Moffitt's PV-10 mechanism of action paper, "Announces Publication of Article in Oncotarget Detailing PV-10's Immuno-Ablative Mechanism of Action" -- with the company's CTO Dr. Eric Wachter, PhD calling the paper's publication "a a watershed event in the development of PV-10."

I really liked the press release, which is rare praise for an aspect of the company — corporate communications — that has been woeful and woefully lacking dating back to when I began due diligence on Provectus. I found the PR crisp, cogent, insightful and nuanced.

Key takeaway: In my view, the upshot of the release, and more importantly the Oncotarget paper, stemming from Moffitt's initial mouse work first presented at AACR in April 2013 — "Intralesional Injection with PV-10 Induces a Systemic Anti-tumor Immune Response in Murine Models of Breast Cancer and Melanoma" — is that PV-10 is an immunotherapy, or an immuno-ablative as Provectus has labelled its lead, advanced, investigational oncology drug that should focus attention on PV-10's physical chemistry properties (i.e., ablative, and e.g., ablation, chemoablation, etc.) rather than the biological chemistry properties of immune checkpoint inhibitors, oncolytic viruses, and certain other classes of immunotherapies. Keep in mind that folks more recently are wondering about the potential immunotherapeutic properties of chemotherapy and radiotherapy, which are "non-biologics."

Mouse-to-man-to-mouse: I'd venture, in my limited experience as a biotechnology or pharmaceutical industry investor, that Moffitt's work might be the epitome of a translational study, going from mouse to human, and back to mice before returning to human, as the cancer center team confirmed and/or discovered new things in their work. As Eric said in the PR {underlined emphasis below is mine}:
"The Moffitt researchers have systematically documented each of the key steps in the immuno-oncology cycle described by Chen and Mellman in their landmark review article (Oncology Meets Immunology: the Cancer-Immunity Cycle. Immunity 2013; 39: 1-10). In an exemplary demonstration of translational medicine, this team identified important immunologic markers in model systems and verified key facets of these in clinical trial participants, and similarly identified other markers in clinical trial participants and substantiated these in mouse models. While a number of their main observations were previously reported at scientific meetings, these are presented here in detailed, integrated fashion for the first time."
Moffitt team leader Dr. Shari Pilon-Thomas also broached this mouse-to-man-to mouse approach:
"Concordance of tumor-specific T cells in peripheral blood of clinical trial participants and mice led us to look for triggers of T cell activation. Working back from these observations, we found that HMGB1 release was common in mouse and man after tumor ablation with PV-10. These results support PV-10 ablation and the resulting tumor necrosis as the upstream trigger for systemic anti-tumor response." {concordance = agreement}
PV-10 is an immunotherapy: With Moffitt's work, presentation as Eric noted in a "detailed, integrated fashion for the first time," I'm hard pressed to understand anyone saying, in an intellectually honest fashion of course, that PV-10 is anything but an immunotherapy. As Eric further noted:
"This paper is a watershed event in the development of PV-10, walking the reader through all the steps of immune activation after PV-10 injection, from immunogenic cell death and signaling via release of HMGB1, dendritic cell recruitment and infiltration into draining lymph nodes, activation of tumor-specific T cells, and killing of uninjected tumors upon infiltration by these T cells."
Additionally, Eric underscored the immunotherapeutic role PV-10 plays as a single agent or monotherapy, and in combination with other therapies and therapeutics {bolded emphasis is mine, too}:
"This mechanism of action informed the design of the two active PV-10 clinical trials: NCT02288897 in patients with locally advanced cutaneous melanoma (melanoma limited to the skin) to test the hypothesis that PV-10 alone can produce a systemic immune response that translates to longer progression free survival (PFS); and NCT02557321 in patients with later stage melanoma to test whether combination of PV-10 with the recently approved systemic immunotherapy, pembrolizumab, can 'induce and boost' an immune response against melanoma."
Updated (5/13/16): I discussed choice of medical journal with Eric. He said New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM), Journal of Clinical Oncology (JCO) and the like focus on relatively large clinical trials. Moffitt's topic and study were not a good match for NEJM, JCO, etc. Oncotarget is a high-impact journal specializing in oncology mechanism and therapeutics (i.e., translational medicine), having a 2014 impact factor of 6.4. For comparison*, for example:
  • NEJM's 2014 impact factor was 55.9,
  • Lancet, 45.2,
  • JCO, 18.4,
  • Cancer Research 9.3,
  • Clinical Cancer Research, 8.7,
  • Oncotarget, 6.4,
  • Cancer, 4.9,
  • Journal of Immunotherapy, 4.0
  • Immunology 3.8, and
  • Melanoma Research, 2.2.

The NEJM and the Lancet cover all diseases, while Melanoma Research only covers melanoma. As such, readership naturally is very different, as are resulting citations.

* The information above can be downloaded from this file.

January 29, 2016

PV-10 (Rose Bengal) and the Cancer Immunity Cycle

Takeaways:
  • Provectus collaborators like Moffitt Cancer Center in Tampa, FL and the University of Illinois at Chicago ("UIC") in Chicago, IL eventually should independently show that all of the steps in the "cancer immunity cycle," created and popularized by Chen & Mellman in 2013 [1], are present with the company's investigational drug PV-10 (Rose Bengal).
  • This presence might be shown pre-clinically in different solid tumor cancer models (melanoma, colon cancer) as well as clinically in melanoma patients.
[1] Oncology Meets Immunology: The Cancer-Immunity Cycle, Chen et al., Immunity, Volume 39, Issue 1, 1-10

At the 2016 JP Morgan Healthcare Conference, both Bristol-Myers and Roche (Genentech) incorporated cancer immunity cycle visuals in their respective investors presentations. Note that Chen and Mellman are Genentech employees. Bristol-Myers's illustration is on the left, and Roche's is on the right.
Click to enlarge.
Note the differences between the two cycle designs and illustrations.
Click to enlarge.
Notable to me above are (i) Bristol-Myers' explicit mention of the tumor microenvironment, (ii) Bristol's explicit mention of NK cells, (iii) Bristol's expansion of Roche's "T cell killing" into the tumor microenvironment and T cell and NK cell activations, and below (iv) Roche's placement of Amgen's intralesional agent T-Vec (Imylgic).
Click to enlarge.
In July 2014 I created a presentation discussing the cancer immunity cycle steps and where they were present with PV-10 based on the information then available, PV-10, and the Cancer Immunity Cycle.
Click to enlarge.
Click to enlarge.
I revised in draft form the above to potentially explore cycle steps 4, 5 and 6 below with PV-10 based on Moffitt and UIC's work thus far, "Intralesional Rose Bengal in Melanoma Elicits Tumor Immunity via High Mobility Group Box 1" and "PV-10 Induces Potent Immunogenic Apoptosis in Colon Cancer Cells," respectively.
Click to enlarge.
Click to enlarge.

June 7, 2015

PV-10: Total cell death, changes in nitric oxide production and intracellular pH, within hours of exposure. Step 5?

At first blush the University of Illinois at Chicago's College of Medicine's Department of Surgical Oncology's Ajay Maker Laboratory's PV-10 (rose bengal)-related abstract of their preclinical colorectal cancer murine model work (see abstract P134, page S86) at the 2015 annual meeting of the Society of Surgical Oncology ("SSO") — see my blog post Intralesional Injection of Rose Bengal Induces an Anti-tumor Immune Response and Potent Tumor Regressions in a Murine Model of Colon Cancer — led me to frame a narrative of:
  • Multiple third party medical research institutions (Florida's Moffitt Cancer Center, Illinois' University of Illinois at Chicago or UIC) at arms length from Provectus, having received only PV-10 from Provectus but operating under unrestricted grants from the company,
  • Demonstrated (preclinically) both prongs of PV-10's approach to fighting cancer: (a) a local effect generated via tumor ablation following injection, and (b) a systemic effect delivered via a subsequent tumor-specific immune response,
Click to enlarge. A screenshot from Provectus' investor presentation
  • In multiple indications (melanoma, breast cancer, colorectal cancer). See the blog's News page item Third party non-clinical work (June 5, 2015).
Stepping back, as a result of re-reading the UIC abstract, I was struck by the Results statement:
"PV-10 induced near total cell death, corresponding increases in nitric oxide production, and decreased intracellular pH in both CT26 murine and HT29 human CRC cells within hours of exposure compared to controls (p<0.01), and at levels similar to 5FU." {Underlined emphasis is mine}
Note: 5FU is another name for fluorouracil, a systemic chemotherapy given for "...anal, breast, colorectal, oesophageal, stomach, pancreatic and skin cancers (especially head and neck cancers)."

Rose Bengal ("RB") is the active pharmaceutical ingredient in Provectus' investigational oncology compound PV-10 (a 10% solution of RB) as well as the company's investigational dermatology compound PH-10 (a 0.001% to 0.01% gel of RB).

Cell death by RB [without affecting normal material] is well cited in biomedical literature by Provectus as well as folks outside of company founders/innovators, such as (reverse chronological order):
  1. 2015: O2 and ca(2+) fluxes as indicators of apoptosis induced by rose bengal-mediated photodynamic therapy in human oral squamous carcinoma cells,
  2. 2015: UIC above,
  3. 2014: Rose Bengal suppresses gastric cancer cell proliferation via apoptosis and inhibits nitric oxide formation in macrophages,
  4. 2012: Selective toxicity of rose bengal to ovarian cancer cells in vitro,
  5. 2012 to date: Moffitt,
  6. 2009: Enzyme-assisted photosensitization activates different apoptotic pathways in Rose Bengal acetate treated HeLa cells. Histochemistry and Cell Biology, and
  7. 2006: Rose bengal induces dual modes of cell death in melanoma cells and has clinical activity against melanoma
Changes in nitric oxide production because of RB is much less documented or discussed. Nitric oxide, or chemical name NO:
"...is said to have both tumoricidal as well as tumor promoting effects which depend on its timing, location, and concentration. NO has been suggested to modulate different cancer-related events including angiogenesis, apoptosis, cell cycle, invasion, and metastasis. On the other hand, it is also emerging as a potential anti-oncogenic agent." (2013: Nitric oxide and cancer: a review) {Underlined emphasis is mine}
"Paradoxically therefore, NO (and related reactive nitrogen species) may have both genotoxic and angiogenic properties."
UIC discuss increased NO production induced by PV-10 (RB).

Rabe et al. discuss the inhibition of NO formation in macrophages induced by RB. Macrophages are a type of white blood cell:
"The tumor microenvironment is a complex ecology of cells that evolves with and provides support to tumor cells during the transition to malignancy. Among the innate and adaptive immune cells recruited to the tumor site, macrophages are particularly abundant and are present at all stages of tumor progression. Clinical studies and experimental mouse models indicate that these macrophages generally play a protumoral role. In the primary tumor, macrophages can stimulate angiogenesis and enhance tumor cell invasion, motility, and intravasation. During monocytes and/or metastasis, macrophages prime the premetastatic site and promote tumor cell extravasation, survival, and persistent growth. Macrophages are also immunosuppressive, preventing tumor cell attack by natural killer and T cells during tumor progression and after recovery from chemo- or immunotherapy. Therapeutic success in targeting these protumoral roles in preclinical models and in early clinical trials suggests that macrophages are attractive targets as part of combination therapy in cancer treatment." (2014: Tumor-Associated Macrophages: From Mechanisms to Therapy) {Underlined emphasis is mine}
Through medical literature to date, PV-10 could be associated with several steps of Chen and Mellman's cancer-immunity cycle.
Click to enlarge. Full presentation is here.
Of the remaining steps to be associated with/linked to PV-10 is Step 5, where inhibitors of vascular endothelial growth factor ("VEGF") potentially can promote T cell infiltration into tumors (paraphrased from Chen & Mellman's paper). Nitric oxide, VEGF and angiogenesis are linked; "[a]ngiogenesis is a normal and vital process in growth and development, as well as in wound healing and in the formation of granulation tissue. However, it is also a fundamental step in the transition of tumors from a benign state to a malignant one..." Anti-angiogenesis treatment presumably prevents tumors from having their own blood supply, and thus grow.

It was rumored the UIC work was kicked-off around ASCO 2014. Moffitt presented additional pre-clinical and clinical work related to their mechanism of action study of PV-10 at AACR and ASCO 2014. It also was rumored an undetermined time ago Moffitt had associated/linked PV-10 with/to every step of the cancer-immunity cycle but one.

Does the UIC work confirm Moffitt's work on Step 5, or does it fill-in their work? Perhaps the more pertinent question is whether or not PV-10 may be associated with/linked to all steps of the cancer-immunity cycle.